Skip to content
ÆVRI, Aeilus Value Research Institute

Students

Value Management Theory in five concepts

A short guide to the core constructs of Value Management Theory (VMT) and how they are used to analyse employee-centricity as a source of competitive advantage.

Value Management Theory (VMT) treats value as a systemic, pre-market construct. It flows, transforms and degrades inside organisations long before it shows up in financial results. This guide introduces its core concepts as they are used in the ÆVRI paper on employee-centric competitive advantage.

1. Value

The potential of a system to improve its ability to achieve its objectives through changes in state. Value exists before market exchange and is shaped by internal decisions about structure, coordination and resources.

2. Anti-value

Value that is lost or destroyed. In employee systems it includes burnout, disengagement, skill obsolescence, mistrust and coordination friction. Anti-value accumulates over time and often stays invisible in traditional metrics.

3. Value flows

Processes through which value is created and transformed, for example onboarding, development, collaboration, leadership interaction and career progression. Depending on system design, a flow can amplify value or generate anti-value.

4. Value systems

Organisations host several coexisting value systems, such as employee, organisational and customer value systems, each with its own priorities and evaluation criteria. Employee value systems are themselves heterogeneous: roles, career stages and personal circumstances create different value logics.

5. Value converters

VMT names value converters among its foundational constructs. In the Æilus formalization of VMT, a value currency, value converters and aggregation rules together make it possible to compare heterogeneous initiatives on a shared scale. The Value System Schema (VSS) supports visual modelling of value systems and their interactions.

Why it matters

The paper argues that organisations struggle to turn employee-centric initiatives into durable advantage because of a theoretical gap: they lack a formal language to compare and govern employee-related value at system level. Competitive advantage arises when the employee value system is coherent with the organisational and customer value systems.

Open research questions

  • How can value and anti-value in employee systems be measured quantitatively?
  • Do the same patterns hold across industries?
  • What can dynamic simulation of employee value systems reveal?

These are good starting points for a thesis or a paper. ÆVRI welcomes student research.

Based on ÆVRI research

How valuable was this to you?

0Value from 1 evaluations

Reading time counts as your evaluation. Sign in to choose a reaction yourself.

Add a comment

Sign in to leave a comment.

How value is evaluated

Written by the Aeilus Value Research Institute. This is an explanatory material, not peer-reviewed research.

More materials: Students